DSC_0357In 2013, five of Alabama’s elected officials resigned before their term expired to pursue other employment. Three members of the Alabama House of Representatives took positions that potentially require lobbying of the Legislature. Currently, former state officials may not lobby their former department or “legislative body” until two years has elapsed; however, the Alabama Senate and Alabama House of Representatives have been determined by the Alabama Ethics Commission to be two separate bodies. In practice, this allows the three former Representatives to immediately begin lobbying the Senate, or vice versa, without waiting the required two years. This “Legislative Body Loophole” runs contrary to the original intent of the statute and must be fixed.

Resigning in the middle of a term causes a number of issues. First, special elections are normally held on dates that do not coincide with general election or primary dates and garner notoriously low voter turnout. These low turnout races allow special interest groups in Alabama to have a significant impact on the outcome.

Some in the Alabama Legislature recognize the need to close the “Legislative Body Loophole” and thereby solve these three key issues.

Recently, the strong Republican seat in House District 74 was inundated by approximately $23,000 worth of Alabama Education Association (AEA) ads attacking pro-school choice candidate Charlotte Meadows. As a result of the paltry 16% turnout during the runoff, the AEA spent upwards of $6 on each vote. In short, a few hundred votes in a low-turnout special election can be the difference in electing a representative.

Second, each local primary, runoff, and general election costs the taxpayers approximately $40,000, regardless of how many voters show up. To replace the three House of Representatives seats, the citizens of Alabama spent nearly a quarter of a million dollars. Special elections are meant for extraordinary circumstances such as death of a member or incapacity. With State budget woes and cuts to programs statewide, a special election to replace a representative who simply wants to leave the job they campaigned hard to win is not a good use of taxpayer resources.

Finally, resigning from the Legislature to immediately lobby former colleagues creates a serious conflict of interest. In order for bills to be passed, a House member likely has allies in the Senate, and vice versa, who have helped shepherd bills through the legislative process. Of course, the newly minted lobbyists will likely make first contact with those same allies and friends.

Thankfully, some in the Alabama Legislature recognize the need to close the “Legislative Body Loophole” and thereby solve these three key issues. First, the incentive for legislators to resign during their term would be removed. Alabamians should have a reasonable expectation that their representative or senator will hold up their end of the democratic process. Resigning early for a job opportunity largely created by the official’s tenure in public office fuels the cynicism that so often plagues the public’s perception of politicians. Second, it would save valuable revenue because the taxpayers of Alabama would not have to bankroll multiple special elections. Third, elected officials must be held to the ethical standards that were already intended by the law. Keep in mind, the original lobbying restraints were passed to prevent legislators from immediately turning into lobbyists.

Simply put, it is time for Alabama to slam the revolving door shut.

MORE ON API in the Editorials

The Need for Education Reform Didn’t Die with the Defeat of Amendment One

When voters defeat a proposed state amendment, it is often thought that the matter is put to rest. That is often the case, but when Alabama’s voters went to the polls in March and shot down a proposal to replace the elected state board of education in favor of one appointed by the governor, they […]

Balancing Rights and Love of Neighbor

Alabama Governor Kay Ivey has announced that our state is moving into an initial phase of economic recovery, known as “Safer at Home.” It relaxes restrictions on many businesses while keeping others, like restaurants, heavily limited for now. The hope is that all businesses will be allowed to resume a modified type of operation shortly. […]

Having Freedom is not Irresponsible

When Georgia’s governor announced that the state would allow some non-essential businesses to reopen, everyone had an opinion. What I heard and read most often, however, was how his lifting of restrictions was, “reckless” and “irresponsible.” I see a glimmer of hope in Governor Ivey’s recently issued “Safer at Home Order” as it lessens some […]

MORE FROM Brandon Demyan

Big Government’s Uber Problem

As Birmingham continues its evolution to become a modern and relevant city, recent ordinances designed to make it difficult for food trucks, Uber, and other innovative businesses to operate are putting that vision in reverse. What is Uber? Uber is similar to a taxi service, but operates through an application accessible by smartphone that allows […]

Big Problems with Alabama’s “Bare Bones” Government

Public employees often state that the lack of take home pay is one reason why their benefits should remain generous and well above those of private employment plans. When benefit plans are included, public employees on average actually make about $6,000 more than their private employee counterparts in Alabama. With over 300,000 state and local […]

One Photo, One Vote: Alabama’s Voter ID Law

The primary elections of June 3, 2014 could bring change for many of Alabama’s elected office holders. It will definitely bring a change in voter identification requirements. In previous elections, voters could simply provide a utility bill or a fishing license to vote.  Alabama’s voter ID law, passed in 2011 and implemented for the first […]